THE MAIN PROVISIONS OF “STRUT-AND-TIES” MODEL FOR THE CALCULATION OF SHEAR RESISTANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE ELEMENTS

Main Article Content

V. SANNIKAVA
TUR TUR

Abstract

The main provisions of “Strut-and-ties” model, based on the current code requirements are considered. The basic requirements for design and calculation of resistance of compression and tension model elements are summarized. Various approaches to the calculation of the resistance of compression elements, taking into account the softening coefficient of concrete are presented.

Article Details

How to Cite
SANNIKAVA, V., & TUR, T. (2018). THE MAIN PROVISIONS OF “STRUT-AND-TIES” MODEL FOR THE CALCULATION OF SHEAR RESISTANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE ELEMENTS. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part F. Constructions. Applied Sciences, (16), 19-29. Retrieved from https://journals.psu.by/constructions/article/view/260
Author Biography

TUR TUR, Brest State Technical University

д-р техн. наук, проф.

References

Ritter, W. Die Bauweise Hennebique / W. Ritter // Schweizerische Bauzeitung. – 1899. – V. 33, № 7. – P. 59–61.

Mörsch, E. Concrete-Steel Construction / E. Mörsch // McGraw-Hill (English translation by E.P. Goodrich). – New York, 1909.

Lampert, P. Ultimate Strength and Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Torsion and Bending / P. Lampert, B. Thürlimann // IABSE Publications. – Zurich, Switzerland, 1971. – № 31-1. – P. 107–131.

Ramirez, J. Evaluation of Modified Truss-Model Approach for Beams in Shear / J. Ramirez, J.E. Breen // Center for Transportation Research Report № 248-4F. – Austin, Texas, 1983.

Ramirez, J. Proposed Design Procedure for Shear and Torsion in Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete / J. Ramirez, J.E. Breen // ACI Structural Journal. – 1991. – V. 88, № 5. – P. 562–571.

Kupfer, H. Erweiterung der Mörsch Schen Fachwerkanalogie mit Hilfe des Prinzips von Minimum der Formanderungsarbeit (Generalization of Mörsch Truss Analogy Using the Principle of Minimum Strain Energy) / H. Kupfer // Comite Euro-International du Beton, Bulletin d’Information, № 40, CEB. – Paris, 1964. – P. 44–57.

Schlaich, J. Towards a Consistent Design of Structural Concrete / J. Schlaich, K. Schäfer, M. Jennewein // Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute. – May-June 1987. – V. 32. – № 3. – P. 74–150.

Гвоздев, А.А. Определение разрушающей нагрузки для статически неопределимых систем, претерпевающих пластические деформации / А.А. Гвоздев. – Проект и стандарт, 1934. – № 8. – С. 10–16.

Examination of the AASHTO LRFD Strut and Tie Specifications. Center for Transportation Research Report 0-4371-2 / M.D. Brown [et al.]. – University of Texas, Austin, April 2006. – 330 p.

ACI (American Concrete Institute) Committee 318. 2014. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318 – 14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14). – Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.

AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. – 8th Edition. – Washington, September 2017.

fib Model Code 2010, Vol.1. – Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne – EPFL, Lausanne, March 2010.

Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General rules, rules for buildings, bridges and civil engineering structures: prEN 1992-1-1:2018 (Eurocode 2). – Brussel : European Committee for Standardization, April 2018. – 293 p.

Design of Concrete Structures. General Rules and Rules for Buildings: EN 1992-1: 2001 (Eurocode 2) / Brussel : European Committee for Standardization, Introduced October 2001. – 230 p.

Williams, C. Strut-and-Tie Model Design Examples for Bridges: Final Report FHWA/TX-12/5-5253-01-1 / C. Williams, D. Deschenes, O. Bayrak. – Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas, Austin. – June 2012.

Тур, В.В. Расчет железобетонных конструкций при действии перерезывающих сил / В.В. Тур, А.А. Кондратчик. – Брест : БрГТУ, 2000. – 397 с.

Тур, В.В. Прочность и деформации бетона в расчетах конструкций / В.В. Тур, Н.А. Рак. – Брест : БрГТУ, 2003. – 252 с.