TOPONYMIC LANDMARK IN URBANONYMY OF BELARUS AND FRANCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article substantiates the relevance of a comparative study of urbanonyms in Belarus and France, formed from the names of geographical objects. Both general and nationally specific thematic groups of names characteristic of the two systems have been established. The field structure of the subsystem of toponymic urbanonyms and the core-peripheral relations inherent in it are described; it has been demonstrated that the systems of urbanonyms of Belarus and France, formed from the names of toponymic landmarks, are characterized as typologically similar (thematic commonality of groups of names; partial coincidence of the field structure of systems and the representation of texts of culture) and nationally specific features (differences in the composition of identified groups and texts of culture realized by names, unequal quantitative ratio of groups as a reflection of differences in national nominative priorities). Extensive illustrative material shows that the system of street names in Belarusian and French cities has individual features and at the same time is an example of the sustainable embodiment of the main historical tendencies of the urbanonym nomination as a whole.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Gendron S. Odonymie de La Châtre (Indre) // Nouvelle revue d’onomastique. – 2014. – №°56. – P. 71–99.
Горбаневский М.В. Русская городская топонимия: Методы историко-культурного изучения и создания компьютерных словарей / Ин-т языков народов России. – М.: Общ-во любителей российской словесности, 1996. – 304 с.
Соловьёв А.Н. Урбанонимы Смоленской области, образованные от топонимов // Региональная ономастика: проблемы и перспективы исследования: сб. науч. ст. / Витеб. гос. ун-т; редкол.: Ю.В. Дулова и др. – Витебск, 2023. – С. 162–166.
Mellet G. Les noms de rues à Dijon: étude de géographie urbaine // L’information géographique. – V. 13. – 1949. – №°4. – P. 135–137.
Quantin G. Les noms de rues de Reims // Revue Internationale d’Onomastique. – 1950. – 2e année. – №°3. – P. 177–192.
Beaurepaire de F. Aux origines de la toponymie urbaine: les anciens noms de rues de Rouen // Nouvelle revue d’onomastique. – 1996. – №°27–28. – P. 55–66.
Billy P.-H. Essai de typologie historique // La toponymie urbaine. Significations et enjeux: actes du Colloque, Aix-en-Provence, 11–12 décembre 1998 / Université d’Aix-Marseille, CNRS; sous la dir. de: J.-C. Bouvier, J.-M. Guillon, Paris. – 2001. – P. 17–41.
Badariotti D. Les noms de rue en géographie. Plaidoyer pour une recherche sur les odonymes / Street names, an argument for a geographic research // Annales de Géographie. – 2002. – T. 111. – №°625. – P. 285–302.
Дорофеенко М.Л. Номинативные приоритеты в урбанонимии Франции (на материале названий улиц коммуны Ла-Гард) // Наука – образованию, производству, экономике: материалы 72-й Регион. науч.-практ. конф. преподавателей, научных сотрудников и аспирантов, Витебск, 20 фев. 2020 г.: в 2 т. / Витеб. гос. ун-т; редкол.: И.М. Прищепа (гл. ред.). – Витебск, 2020. – С. 121–122.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- M. DARAFEYENKA, VICONYMS OF BELARUS AND FRANCE, REFLECTING THE PHYSICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL FEATURES OF THE AREAS, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part A. Humanities: No. 4 (2024)