MATH MODELING TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENCE AND FLOWS

Article Sidebar

Abstract views: 92
PDF Downloads: 55
pdf (rus) (Русский)
Published: Sep 7, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52928/2070-1616-2023-48-2-30-35
Keywords:
качество дорожного движения, моделирование, модель Хермана–Пригожина traffic quality, modeling, Herman–Prigozhin model

Main Article Content

D. KAPSKII
Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk
V. KASYANIK
Brest State Technical University
A. BAKHANOVICH
Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk
G. KUKHARENOK
Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk

Abstract

The issues of assessing and identifying congestion and pre-congestion situations on the example of highways of the largest city, as well as identifying places of change in the quality of traffic in various sections of the road network based on the Herman–Prigozhin model, are considered.

Article Details

How to Cite
KAPSKII, D., KASYANIK, V., BAKHANOVICH, A., & KUKHARENOK, G. (2023). MATH MODELING TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENCE AND FLOWS. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part B. Industry. Applied Sciences, (2), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.52928/2070-1616-2023-48-2-30-35
Issue
No. 2 (2023)
Section
Transport
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

D. KAPSKII, Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk

д-р техн. наук, доц.

A. BAKHANOVICH, Ministry of Education of the Republic of Belarus, Minsk

д-р техн. наук, доц.

G. KUKHARENOK, Belarusian National Technical University, Minsk

д-р техн. наук, проф.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Babkov, V.F. (1982). Dorozhnye usloviya i bezopasnost' dvizheniya. Moscow: Transport. (In Russ.)

Kapskii, D.V. (2008). Prognozirovanie avariinosti v dorozhnom dvizhenii. Minsk: BNTU. (In Russ.)

Vrubel', Yu.A. (2003). Poteri v dorozhnom dvizhenii. Minsk: BNTU. (In Russ.)

Elvik, R. (2001). Cost-benefit analysis of road safety measures: applicability and controversies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(1), 9–17. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00010-5 (In Engl.)

Vrubel', Yu.A., Kapskii, D.V. & Kot, E.N. (2006). Opredelenie poter' v dorozhnom dvizhenii. Minsk: BNTU. (In Russ.)

Mikhailov, A.Yu. & Golovnykh, I.M. (2004). Sovremennye tendentsii proektirovaniya i rekonstruktsii ulichno-dorozhnykh setei gorodov. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Vrubel', Yu.A. (1996). Organizatsiya dorozhnogo dvizheniya: v 2 ch. Ch. 1. Minsk: Belorusskii fond bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya. (In Russ.)

Boardman, Anthony E., Greenberg, David H., Vining, Aidan R. & Weimer, David L. (2005). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. (In Engl.)

Dryu, D. (1972). Teoriya transportnykh potokov i upravlenie imi. [Theory of traffic flows and their management]. Moscow: Tpanspopt. (In Russ.)

Sil'yanov, V.V. (1977). Teoriya transportnykh potokov v proektirovanii dorog i organizatsii dvizheniya. – Moscow: Transport. (In Russ.)

Prigogine, I. & Herman, R. (1971). Kinetic theory of vehicular traffic. New York: Elsevier. (In Engl.)

Herman, R. & Prigoginc, I. (1979). A Two-Fluid Approach to Town Traffic. Science, (204), 148–151. DOI: 10.1126/science.204.4389.148 (In Engl.)