THE EVOLUTION MODELS OF THE COMMUNICATION IN THE MODERN MEDICINE

Main Article Content

A. KLIMOVICH

Abstract

The article deals with the main types of communication between doctor and patient in the modern medicine. This topic is one of the most relevant, because communication problems can significantly affect the treatment process. The author points out the interdisciplinary nature of this issue, connection between the evolution of models and a particular type of society. The classical concept of medical paternalism is supplemented by the concept of paternalistic coercion by J. Dvorkin. The inevitability of the paternalistic tendencies in the considering of socially significant benefits is noted. The author considers the shortcomings of the autonomous model and explains why there was a transition from the autonomous model to the technocratic one.

Article Details

How to Cite
KLIMOVICH, A. (2019). THE EVOLUTION MODELS OF THE COMMUNICATION IN THE MODERN MEDICINE. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part E. Pedagogic Sciences, (15), 88-91. Retrieved from https://journals.psu.by/pedagogical/article/view/150
Section
Philosophy
Author Biography

A. KLIMOVICH, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk

канд. филос. наук, доц.

References

Изуткин, Д.А. Роль врача и пациента в различных моделях их отношений / Д.А. Изуткин // Социология медицины. – 2015. – № 14 (1). – С. 45–48.

Соколова, О.В. Взгляды современных немецких исследователей на проблему патернализма в уголовном праве /О.В. Соколова // Философия права. – 2016. – № 5. – С. 101–105.

Dworkin, G. Paternalism / G. Dworkin. – Mode of access: http://www.sjsu.edu/people/paul.bashaw/courses/phil186fall2012/s1/Paternalism.pdf. – Date of access: 04.03.2019.

Рубинштейн, А.Я. Институциональная эволюция патернализма / А.Я. Рубинштейн. – М. : Ин-т экономики, 2015. – 68 с.

Mckinistry, B. Paternalism and the doctor–patient relationship in general practice / B. Mckinistry // British journal of general practice. – 1992. – № 42. – P. 340–342.

Тищенко, П.Д. Био-власть в эпоху биотехнологий / П.Д. Тищенко. – М. : ИФ РАН, 2001. – 177 с.

Пищита, А.Н. Согласие на медицинское вмешательство. Медико-правовой анализ. Юридические стандарты. Практика реализации / А.Н. Пищита. – М. : Изд-во Центр. клинич. больницы РАН, 2006. – 210 с.

Cohen-Almagor, R. Right to die / R. Cohen-Almagor. – Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277711211_Right_to_Die. – Date of access: 04.08.2019.

Климович, А.И. Элфи Эванс и этические перекрестки современной медицины / А.И. Климович. – Режим доступа: https://bioethics.belmapo.by/article/alfie-evans-and-ethical-intersections-of-modern-medicine. – Дата доступа: 22.04.2019.

Floyd, R.D. The Technocratic, Humanistic and Holistic Paradigms of Childbirth / R.D. Floyd // International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. – 2001. – № 1. – P. 5–23.