COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEATURES OF VALUE ORIENTATIONS FULL-TIME AND CORRESPONDENCE STUDENTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the context of global transformations affecting the political, economic, cultural and other spheres of life of the population, there is an integration of views, worldviews and values of people. A special group among the population can be identified student youth, whose views, on the one hand, are traditional in nature, as they are formed on the basis of the existing historical experience of the country, and on the other hand, they are influenced by information resources and the prerequisites of the modern era, which inevitably affect the formation of value orientations of the student's personality. This article presents the results of a study of the value orientations of full-time and part-time students, as well as a comparison of the value orientations of the two groups in order to clarify the dynamics and specifics of the influence of different learning environments, taking into account existing professional experience.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
S. SOKOLOVSKAYA, National Research Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N.I. Lobachevsky
канд. психол. наук, доц.
V. AMPLEEVA, ANO "Akron-Academy Konopleva", Primorsky village, Stavropol district, Samara region
канд. психол. наук, доц.
References
Ананьев Б.Г. Человек как предмет познания. – СПб.: Питер, 2016. – 288 с.
Зыкова Н.Ю. Развитие профессиональных ценностных ориентаций студентов средствами гештальт-терапии: автореф. дис. ... канд. психол. наук: 19.00.07. – Курск, 2006. – 24 с.
Лазурский А.Ф. Классификация личностей / под ред. М.Я. Басова и В.Н. Мясищева. – Издание третье, перераб. – Л.: Гос. изд-во, 1924. – 290 с.
Мотков О.И., Огнева Т.А. Методика «Ценностные ориентации» [Электронный ресурс]. – 2008. – URL: http://www.psychology-online.net/articles/doc-1128.html (дата обращения: 03.04.2023).
Мясищев В.Н. Психология отношений: избранные психологические труды / под ред. А.А. Бодалева. – 4-е изд. – М.: Изд-во Моск. психол.-соц. ин-та; Воронеж: МОДЭК, 2011. – 398 с.
Нартова-Бочавер С.К. Психологическая суверенность как критерий личностной зрелости / под ред. А.Л. Журавлева, Е.А. Сергиенко // Феномен и категория зрелости в психологии. – М.: Смысл, 2007. – С. 149–173.
Рубинштейн С.Л. Основы общей психологии. – СПб.: Питер, 2015. – 720 с.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- YU. BRIKSA, TO FORPROS ABOUT THE PROFESSIONAL AND GENDER IDENTITY FEMALE MILITARY PERSONNEL, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part E. Pedagogic Sciences: No. 7 (2020)
- Yu. BRIKSA, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS OF THE FIRST AND SECOND COURSES, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part E. Pedagogic Sciences: No. 7 (2021)