LEGAL PROTECTION OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INVENTIONS: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article discusses approaches to the legal protection of biotechnological inventions on the example of the EAEU member states, EU member states, the USA and Australia. As part of the study, judicial practices were considered and the main trends in the field of legal protection of biotechnological inventions were identified. The article focuses on approaches to determining industrial applicability, inventive step and novelty in the previously listed countries. The main legal acts of the respective states on the legal protection of inventions are considered and analyzed. Based on the study, the main trends and features of the legal protection of biotechnological inventions abroad were identified.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Kiselev, A.S. (2013). Istoriya biotekhnologij i prognoz razvitiya vy`sokotekhnologichnoj mediczinskoj pomoshhi s uchetom dolgosrochnogo soczialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya RF na period do 2030 goda (obzor). Sechenovskij vestnik, 3(13), 41–47. (In Russ.).
Ivankovich, A.D. (2021). Pravovaya priroda biotekhnologii: otechestvennyj i zarubezhnyj opyt. In Pravovaya zashchita intellektual'noj sobstvennosti: problemy teorii i praktiki V.A. Bogonenko (Eds.). Novopolock: PSU, 57–64. (In Russ.).
Lapaeva, V.V. (2019). Mezhdunarodnoe regulirovanie otnoshenij v sfere biomediciny: vzaimodejstvie prava i morali. Pravo. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, (2), 22–44. (In Russ.).
Pilkina, N.N. (2007). Pravovaya ohrana i eticheskie problemy v sfere biotekhnologicheskih izobretenij v ramkah Evropejskoj i Evrazijskoj patentnyh organizacij. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava, (2), 524–531. (In Russ.).
Sheverdin, A.V. (2012). Sozdanie i ispol'zovanie biotekhnologij: istoriya voprosa. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava, (6), 118–126. (In Russ.).
Parfenchik, O.S. (2011). Direktiva o pravovoj ohrane biotekhnologicheskih izobretenij: analiz osnovnyh protivorechij. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij, (4), 25–31. (In Russ.).
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union № 98/44/EC of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. (1998). Official Journal of the European Communities. (Vol. 41, L 213), 13–21.
Abdullin, A.I. (2008). Pravovaya ohrana biotekhnologicheskih izobretenij: evropejskij opyt. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii. (6), 66–78. (In Russ.).
Dutfield, G. & Suthersanen U. (2008). Global Intellectual Property Law. Edward Elgar Pub.
Salickaya, E.A. (2016). Razgranichenie ponyatij “izobretenie” i “otkrytie” v kontekste pravovoj ohrany dostizhenij v oblasti gennoj inzhenerii. In Upravlenie naukoj i naukometriya, 104–121. (In Russ.).
Ponomareva, D.V. (2019). Patentovanie chelovecheskih genov: sudebnaya praktika Soedinennyh SHtatov Ameriki, Kanady i Avstralii. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava, 9(106), 166–173. (In Russ.).
Ivankova, A. P. (2018). Ivanova, A. P. 2018. 04. 042. Kromer N. E. Delo Myriad: budushchee patentosposobnosti geneticheskih materialov. Cromer N. E. Myriad: a look into the future of genetic patentable subject matter // Marquete intellectual property law review. – Milwaukee, 2016. – vol. 20, issue 2. – p. 329–341. – Mode of access: http://scholarship. Law. Marquette. Edu/cgi/viewcontent. Cgi?article=1299&context=iplr. Social'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 4, Gosudarstvo i pravo: Referativnyj zhurnal., 159–163. (In Russ.).
National Research Council Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health (2006). In National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, Law Committee on Science, Technology. National Academies Press.
Brashear, Andrea D. (2001). Evolving biotechnology patent laws in the United States and Europe: Are they inhibiting disease research? 12 Ind Int’l & Comp L Rev.
Zhiganova, L.A. (2019). Sovremennye innovacionnye biotekhnologii SSHA Moskovskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal, (12), 210–228. (In Russ.).
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, RELATIONSHIP OF A DOMAIN NAME WITH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OBJECTS, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 14 (2019)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, THE GROUNDS FOR THE EMERGENCE AND TERMINATION OF THE LEGAL RELATIONS HIPRELATED TOT HEUSE OF DOMAINN AMESTHE SECOND AND SUBSE QUENT LEVELS, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 5 (2017)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, DOMAIN AND DOMAIN NAME: DIFFERENCES IN LEGAL REGULATION, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 13 (2019)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, RIGHT TO A DOMAIN NAME (Part 2), Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 6 (2021)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, RIGHT TO A DOMAIN NAME (Part 1), Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 5 (2021)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, THE TYPES OF SUBJECTS OF LEGAL RELATIONS ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH THE REGISTRATION AND USE OF THE DOMAIN NAME IN THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 5 (2018)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, THE CONCEPT OF “DOMAIN NAME”, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 13 (2018)
- Т. SIAMIONAVA, THE LEGAL NATURE AND ESSENCE OF THE RELATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF DOMAIN NAMES, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 5 (2015)