HEDGE EFFECTIVENESS ASSESMENT IN NON-FINANCIAL ORGANIZATIONS: ECONOMIC APPROACH

Main Article Content

P. PANKOU

Abstract

The existing approaches to assessing the effectiveness of risk hedging with derivatives according to various criteria have been considered. As a result it was found that in economic literature it is not paid enough attention to the development of assessment methodology, which take into account the impact of risk hedging on the overall performance of the organization. In this regard, an economic approach to assessing the effectiveness of hedging has been proposed; it is based on the comparison two basic categories of the efficiency theory – the achieved effects and the associated costs. Within the framework of this approach the effects of hedging that affect the overall result of the organization’s activities were proposed. Also the costs associated with hedging were systematized into external and internal. The essential content of the proposed economic approach is presented in comparison with other approaches, which contributes to understanding the criteria for assessment hedge effectiveness in each specific case. The application of the proposed economic approach in non-financial organizations will contribute to improving the quality of risk hedging by using performance assessment criteria that meet the current goals of the organization and the requirements of senior management.

Article Details

How to Cite
PANKOU, P. (2021). HEDGE EFFECTIVENESS ASSESMENT IN NON-FINANCIAL ORGANIZATIONS: ECONOMIC APPROACH. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and Legal Sciences, (6), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.52928/2070-1632-2021-57-6-63-72
Section
Экономические науки

References

Mikhailov, A.Yu. (2012). Metody otsenki effektivnosti khedzhirovaniya na osnove standarta sFas 133. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya, (26), 40–44. (In Russ.).

Korotaev, S.L. (2019). Otdel’nye aspekty bukhgalterskogo ucheta summ izmeneniya stoimosti instrumentovkhedzhirovaniya denezhnykh potokov. Bukhgalterskii uchet i analiz, (7), 3–9. (In Russ.).

Kon’kova, E.A. (2010). Analiz effektivnosti operatsii khedzhirovaniya v sootvetstvii s MSFO. Akademiya byudzheta i kaznacheistva Minfina Rossii. Fin. Zhurnal, (3), 87–96. (In Russ.).

Sidorenko, Yu.Yu. (2020). Effektivnost’ i optimal’nost’ instrumentov khedzhirovaniya. In Molodezh’ v nauke i predprinimatel’stve : sbornik nauchnykh statei Eds. N.V. Kuznetsov, 188–194. (In Russ.).

Sidorenko, Yu.Yu. (2020). Primenenie metoda analiza ierarkhii dlya postroeniya strategii khedzhirovaniya rynochnykh riskov. Potrebitel’skaya kooperatsiya, (4), 40–48. (In Russ.).

Lakshina, V.V. (2016). Dinamicheskoe khedzhirovanie s uchetom stepeni nepriyatiya riska. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, (20), 156–174. (In Russ.).

Neverovich, O.O. (2014). Khedzhirovanie na neftyanom rynke: mnogomernye modeli s dinamicheskimi uslovnymi korrelyatsiyami. Finansy i kredit, (47), 48–55. (In Russ.).

Pankov, P.I. (2020). Klassifikatsiya derivativov kak ob’ekta upravleniya. Sel’skoe khozyaistvo – problemy i perspektivy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov, Ekonomika (Voprosy agrarnoi ekonomiki), Vol. 50, 183–188. (In Russ.).

Modigliani, F. & Miller M.H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, (48), 261–297.

Masko, L.V. & Pankov, P.I. (2018). Vzaimoobuslovlennost’ investitsionnoi privlekatel’nosti organizatsii i khedzhirovaniya [Interdependence of investment attractiveness of the organization and hedging]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D, Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Herald of Polotsk State University. Series D. Economics and law sciences], (5), 39–45. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Masko, L.V. & Pankov, P.I. (2017). Osobennosti otsenki auditorskogo riska operatsii s derivativami [Peculiarities of the audit risk assessment on derivatives]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D, Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. [Herald of Polotsk State University. Series D. Economics and law sciences], (14), 91–96. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).