ABOUT THE BASIC FUNCTION OF THE COURT IN BELARUS

Main Article Content

А. YARMATS

Abstract

The article analyzes the legislation of the Republic of Belarus for the legal regulation of the functions performed by the courts. The positions of the scientific community on this issue are presented. The conclusion is made about the prevalence of the main function for the court - the administration of justice. The modern forms of manifestation of the preventive and educational functions of the court are highlighted. The author's position on the issue of private rulings (rulings) issued by the courts is expressed.

Article Details

How to Cite
YARMATS А. (2021). ABOUT THE BASIC FUNCTION OF THE COURT IN BELARUS. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and Legal Sciences, (13), 141-143. https://doi.org/10.52928/2070-1632-2021-58-13-141-143
Author Biography

А. YARMATS, Polotsk State University

канд. юрид. наук, доц.

References

Bibilo, V.N. (2002). Pravosudie kak funktsiya suda [Justice as a function of the court]. In V.N. Bibilo (Resp. Eds.). Pravo i demokratiya. [Law and democracy], (12), 97-104. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Bibilo, V.N. (2018). Belorusskoe sudoustroistvo. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika. (In Russ.).

Danilevich, A.A., Zaitseva, L.L., Soltanovich, A.V., Martinovich, I.I. (2010). Sudoustroistvo. In A.A. Danilevich & I.I. Martinovich (Eds). Minsk: Amalfeya (In Russ.).

Makarenkov, A.L. (2015). Rol' sudebnoi vlasti v transformatsii prava otkrytogo obshchestva [The Role of the Judiciary in Transforming open Society Law]. Vesnik Grodzenskaga dzyarzhaunaga univeristeta imya Yanki Kupaly [Bulletin of the Hrodno State University Named Y. Kupala]. (1), 6–12. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Azarov, V.A. (2015). Profilakticheskaya rol' ugolovnogo suda – arkhaizm ili real'nost'? [The Preventive Role of the Criminal Court Is An Archaism or Reality?]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], (10), 66–73. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Dvornikov, A. (2011). Otkrytost' pravosudiya skvoz' prizmu profilaktiki prestuplenii [Openness of Justice through the Prism of Crime Prevention]. Mezhotraslevye issledovaniya [Cross-sectoral research]. (4), 119–122. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Garunova M. N. (2004). Znachenie chastnykh opredelenii sudov v profilaktike prestuplenii [The Iimportance of Private Court Rulings in Crime Prevention]. Vestnik DGU [Bulletin of the DSU]. (5), 102–104. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Merkul', S. E. (2020). Deyatel'nost' suda po preduprezhdeniyu prestupnosti nesovershennoletnikh [Activities of the Court for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency]. Molodoi uchenyi [Young scientist]. (29), 101–103 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Yarmots, E.N. (2020). Praktika organizatsii vyezdnykh sudebnykh zasedanii v Respublike Belarus' [The Practice of Organizing Field Trials in the Republic of Belarus]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seria D Economicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki [Herald of Polotsk State University. Series D. Economics and law sciences]. (5), 89–92. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Bozrov, V.M. (2013). Bor'ba s prestupnost'yu – ne sudebnoe delo [Fighting Crime is not a Legal Matter]. Rossiiskii sud'ya [Russian Judge]. (9), 46–48. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).

Izvarina A.F. (1999). Akty sudov obshchei yurisdiktsii. Moscow. (In Russ.).