METHODOLOGICAL FEATURES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY OF AN ENTERPRISE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Currently, an important item on the global agenda is the achievement of sustainable development, which is impossible without a transition to sustainable production and consumption patterns. Effective business models for ensuring more efficient resource use are offered by the concept of a circular economy (circular economy). Indicators other than those used in linear economics are needed to monitor progress in the transition to a circular economy. The article presents the results of an analytical review and comparison of the most common methodological approaches in English and Russian- speaking scientific research to assessing the circular economy at the local level. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, their areas of possible application are indicated. The conclusion is made about the narrowness of the interpretation of the concept of circular economy in the analyzed works and the need to develop a special tool for assessing the circular economy of an enterprise.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Cayzer, S., Griffiths, P., Beghetto, V. (2017). Design of indicators for measuring product performance in the circular economy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, (10), 289–298. DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2017.1333543.
Reigado, C., Fernandes, S., Barrera Saavedra, Y.M., Ometto, A. (2017). A Circular Economy Toolkit as an Alternative to Improve the Application of PSS Methodologies. Procedia CIRP, (64), 37–42. DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.034.
Scheepens, A.E., Vogtländer, J.G., Brezet, J.C. (2016). Two life cycle assessment (LCA) based methods to analyse and design complex (regional) circular economy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, (114), 257–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.075.
Franklin-Johnson, E., Figgeand, F., Canning, L. (2016) Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, (133), 589–598. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.023.
Pakhomova, N.V., Rikhter, K.K., Vetrova, M.A. (2017). Perekhod k tsirkulyarnoi ekonomike i zamknutym tsepyam postavok kak faktor ustoichivogo razvitiya [Transition to a circular economy and closed supply chains as a factor of sustainable development]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy], (5), 244–268. DOI: 10.21638/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2017.203. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
Gur'eva, M.A. (2020). Razrabotka i aprobatsiya metodicheskogo instrumentariya kompleksnoi otsenki razvitiya tsirkulyarnoi ekonomiki [Development and testing of methodological tools for a comprehensive assessment of the development of a circular economy]. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki [Innovation economy issues], 10 (3), 1425–1448. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.10.3.110517. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).