THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE THEORY OF BELONGEST PROPERTY IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article analyzes the main theories of the object of legal relations, in order to establish the possibility of the subsequent use of the results obtained in the course of reforming the approach to the definition of objects of civil legal relations in general and real legal relations in particular. The greatest attention is paid to such theories about the object of legal relations as monistic and pluralistic theories. Their advantages and disadvantages are highlighted. The possibility of their use at the present stage of the development of social relations, due to the influence of the introduction of new technologies, is critically assessed. Some features of other theories about the object of legal relationship, which are currently of little use, are noted. The legislative experience of the EAEU member states on the definition of objects of civil legal relations has been studied. The proposals aimed at developing the theory about the object of civil legal relations have been made.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Tolstoi, Yu.K. (1959). K teorii pravootnosheniya [To the theory of legal relationship]. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta. (In Russ.).
Khalfina, R.O. (1974). Obshchee uchenie o pravootnoshenii [General doctrine of legal relationship]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. (In Russ.).
Gorbacheva, A.I. (2015). Monisticheskaya i plyuralisticheskaya teorii ob"ekta pravootnosheniya [Monistic and pluralistic theories of the object of legal relationship]. Evraziiskoe nauchnoe ob"dinenie, 6 (6), 96–99. (In Russ.).
Alekseev, S.S. (2009). Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law]. Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russ.).
Belov, V.A. (2003). Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya i Osobennaya chast' [Civil law. General and specific parts]. Moscow: Tsentr YurInfoR. (In Russ.).
Sadikova, O.N. (2006). Grazhdanskoe pravo: v 2 t. T. 1 [Civil law (in 2 vol., Vol. 1)]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT»: «INFRA-M». (In Russ.).
Ioffe, O.S. (1967). Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Soviet civil law]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Yuridicheskaya literatura». (In Russ.).
Agarkov, M.M. (1940). Obyazatel'stvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Obligation under Soviet civil law]. Moscow: Yuridicheskoe izdatel'stvo NKYu SSSR. (In Russ.).
Aleksandrov, N.G. (1955). Zakonnost' i pravootnosheniya v sovetskom obshchestve [Legality and legal relations in Soviet society]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat. (In Russ.).
Bratus', S. N., … Polyanskaya, G. N. (1950). Vo Vsesoyuznom institute yuridicheskikh nauk [At the All-Union Institute of Legal Sciences]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, (9), 82–87. (In Russ.).
Gostojić S., Milosavljević B., Konjović Z. (2013). Ontological Model of Legal Norms for Creating and Using Legislation. ComSIS, 10(1), 151–171. DOI:10.2298/CSIS110804035G.
Man'kovskii, I.A. (2014). Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya chast' : v skhemakh [Civil law. General part: in diagrams]. Minsk : Adukatsyya i vykhavanne. (In Russ.).
Kechek'yan, S.F. (1958). Pravootnosheniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [Legal relations in a socialist society]. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR. (In Russ.).
Protasov, V.N. (1991). Pravootnoshenie kak sistema [Legal relationship as a system]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russ.).
Drobyazko, S.G. & Kozlov, V.S. (2005). Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. Minsk : Amalfeya. (In Russ.).