FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE THEORY OF REGIONAL ECONOMICS IN CHINA

Main Article Content

V. KARPENKA
ZHU HAO

Abstract

Improving the efficiency of China's regional economy is inseparable from the development of regional economic theory. The article periodizes European regional economic theories and analyzes in detail the role of the traditional theory of location, the theory of regional economic development and the theory of new economic geography. It has been proven that the European scientific school had the strongest influence on the formation and development of the Chinese theory of regional economics. A periodization of the development of the theory of regional economics in China has been carried out. Four periods are identified and studied: the period of the theory of balanced development of regional plans (1949–1977); the period of the theory of unbalanced development of the regional economy (1978–1999); period of development of the theory of coordinated regional economic development (2000–2011); a period of high-quality regional economic development (from 2012 to the present).


The formation and development of Western and Chinese regional economic theories are separately outlined, their comparative characteristics are carried out from the point of view of research perspective, research paradigm, research content and development model.

Article Details

How to Cite
KARPENKA, V., & HAO, Z. (2024). FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE THEORY OF REGIONAL ECONOMICS IN CHINA. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and Legal Sciences, (1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.52928/2070-1632-2024-66-1-22-28
Section
Экономические науки
Author Biography

V. KARPENKA, Belarusian State University, Minsk

канд. техн. наук, доц.

References

Dong S. Empirical research on China's regional economic transformation and development. – Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2000. – 25 p.

Hoover Edgar M. An Introduction to Regional Economics. – Shanghai Far East Publishers, 1992. – 36 p.

Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography // Journal of Political Economics. – 1991. – Vol. 99. – P. 483–499.

Shaozhi Su. Research on the gap between China's Coastal and Mainland Economic Development in the 1950s and 1970s // Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. – 2001. – Vol. 3. – P. 6–13.

Dadao Lu. Location theory and regional research methods. – Beijing: Science Press, 1988. – 78 p.

Perroux F. Economic Space: Theory and Applications // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. –1950. – Vol. 64. – P. 89–104.

Lu Yuqi. Study on the Model of Two-core Space Structure. – Areal Research and Development, 1998. – 56 p.

Gottmann J. Megalopolis or the Urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard // Economic Geography. –1957. – Vol. 33. – P. 189–200.

Glaeser E. Do Regional Economies Need Regional Coordination? // Harvard Institute of Economic Research. –2007. – № 2131. – P. 1–66.

Shimou Yao. The Theory and Practice of New Urbanization in China // Scientia Geographica Sinica. – 2014. – Vol. 34, № 6. – P. 641–647.

Карпенко В.М., Кунь Л. Влияние инициативы «Один пояс – один путь» на экономический рост регионов Китая // Вестник Белор. гос. экон. ун-та. – 2022. – № 5 – С. 91–96.

Карпенко Е.М., Чжан Хэи Анализ процесса урбанизации в провинциях Китайской Народной Республики с использованием модели панельной векторной авторегрессии // Вопросы региональной экономики. – 2023. – № 4(57). – С. 233–243.

Рассеко Ю.Ю., Карпенко Е.М. Региональный темп жизни: методика оценки и инструменты управления. – Минск: БГУ, 2023. – 215 с.