A METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYZING THE EFFICIENCY OF WASTE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY FRAMEWORK
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article develops a waste analysis methodology based on the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) concept, designed to assess the environmental, economic, and social efficiency of waste management in alignment with strategic business development goals within the circular economy context. The information foundation for waste analysis is an accounting system for waste throughout its lifecycle, broken down by key management objects: waste volume in physical and monetary terms, the cost of waste management (including actual expenses for collection, accumulation, recycling, and landfilling), and income derived from waste utilization. Waste management is based on a developed system of environmental, economic, and social performance indicators that evaluate both the organization's operational efficiency and the effectiveness of its management efforts in waste handling. This system enables the assessment of progress toward the organization's strategic sustainable development goals. To provide an overall evaluation of waste management efficiency, the calculation of a composite index based on social, economic, and environmental sub-indices is proposed. The proposed analytical methodology for waste management purposes facilitates the planning, continuous monitoring, and control of tasks related to resource conservation, enhancing recycling processes, and minimizing the harmful impact of waste on the environment and society.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
K. AFANASEVA, Euphrosyne Polotskaya State University of Polotsk
канд. экон. наук., доц.
M. PRIMAKOVA, Euphrosyne Polotskaya State University of Polotsk
канд. экон. наук, доц.
I. MATYUSH, Euphrosyne Polotskaya State University of Polotsk
канд. экон. наук
References
Ночевка Ф. Всемирный банк: к 2050 году количество мусора в мире вырастет на 70% // Коммерсантъ. –2018. – URL: https://mayupravo.com/news/view/vsemirnyyi-bank-k-2050-godu-kolichestvo-musora-v-mire-vyrastet-na-70-a30232/.
Друк М. Подходы к сбору и переработке вторсырья в Беларуси меняются: какие решения приняты и что предстоит сделать // Газета «Рэспублiка». – 2026. – URL: https://www.sb.by/articles/vzyat-iz-resursa-maksimum.html?ysclid=mj66a4ptfg522589019.
Integrated Waste Management. Water System Using Radioisotopes for Thermal Energy / R. W. Murray, R. W. Shivers, A. L. Ingelfinger and C. A. Metzger. – 1971. – URL: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19710055674.
Van de Klundert A., Anschutz J. Integrated Sustainable Waste Management. – WASTE.: Gouda, the Netherlands, 2001. – 44 р.
Scheinberg A., Wilson D. C. and Rodic L (eds). Solid Waste Management in the World’s Citie. – 2010. – Earthscan for UN-Habitat.: London, UK. – URL: https://www.eawag.ch/fileadmin/Domain1/Abteilungen/sandec/E-Learning/Moocs/Solid_Waste/W5/Solid_Waste_Management_World_cities_2010.pdf.
Thorpe S. G. Integrated solid waste management: a framework for analysis // Journal of Environmental Systems. – 2001. – № 28(2). – P. 91–105.
Daskalopoulos E., Badr O. and Probert S. D. An integrated approach to municipal solid waste management // Resources Conservation and Recycling. – 1998. – № 24(1). – P. 33–50.
Information support of the circular economy: the objects of accounting at recycling technological cycle stages of industrial waste / S. Vegera, A. Malei, I. Sapeha, V. Sushko // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. – 2018. – Iss. 6(1). – P.190-210.
Bartolomeo M. Environmental management accounting in Europe: current practice and future potential // European Accounting Review. – 2000. – Vol. 9. – P. 31–52.
Pahomova N. V., Rihter K. K. & Vetrova M. A. Transition to the circular economy and the closed chain of supply as a factor for sustainable development // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Economy. – 2017. – № 33(2). – P. 244–268.
Gray R. H. Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting // Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management. – 2000. – Vol. 1. – P. 1–44.
D'Onza G., Greco G., Allegrini M. Full Cost Accounting in the Analysis of Separated Waste Collection Efficiency: A Methodological Proposal. Retrieved. – 2016. – URL: https://books.google.by/books?id=lsAstAEACAAJ&dq=waste+cost+accounting&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2t7q8utzaAhVKaFAKHfnOBFo4ChDoAQg5MAM.
Parajuly K. Circular Economy in E-waste Management: Resource Recovery and Design for End-of-Life. Retrieved – 2017. – URL: https://books.google.by/books?id=Ys2XtAEACAAJ&dq=circular+economy&hl=ru&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_6MLhsNzaAhXGL1AKHaSUDQc4HhDoAQhhMAk.
Соколов Л.И. Управление отходами (Waste management): учеб. пособие. – Вологда: Инфра-Инженерия, 2018. – 208 с.
Латыпова М.В. Анализ развития системы обращения с твердыми отходами в России: проблемы и перспективы с учетом европейского опыта // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. – 2018. – Т. 14, № 4. – С. 741–758.
Лихачева О.И., Советов П.М. Методологические аспекты управления сферой обращения с твердыми бытовыми отходами // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. – 2017. – Т.10. №4. – С. 111–127. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2017.4.52.6.
Kaplan R., Norton D. Balanced system of indicators. from strategy to action. – 1996. – URL: https://pqm-online.com/assets/files/lib/books/norton1.pdf
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- K. AFANASEVA, AUTOMATION AND DIGITALIZATION OF ACCOUNTING: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 6 (2021)
- K. AFANASEVA, M. PRIMAKOVA, Z. SAGDILLAEVA, FORECASTING THE PROBABILITY OF BANKRUPTCY IN THE CONTEXT OF CRISIS MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONS, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 3 (2023)
- N. BUHAROVA, M. PRIMAKOVA, K. AFANASYEVA, FEATURES OF IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION OF EASEMENT IN ACCOUNTING, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 4 (2024)
- K. AFANASEVA, IMPROVEMENT OF THE COMPOSITION AND CLASSIFICATION OF PRODUCTION COSTS IN BEEKEEPING, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 6 (2016)
- K. AFANASEVA, METHODICAL CONTRADICTIONS IN THE ANALYSIS OF THE RECEIVABLES TURNOVER AND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TURNOVER, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 6 (2020)
- M. PRIMAKOVA, ACCOUNTING AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT OF PRODUCTION ACCOUNTING OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN TELECOMMUNICATION ORGANIZATIONS, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 14 (2017)
- M. PRIMAKOVA, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SYSTEM DRIVERS (ALLOCATION BASES) INDIRECT COSTS IN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANIES, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 13 (2018)
- K. AFANASEVA, THE QUESTION IN DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION COSTS IN BEEKEEPING, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 5 (2016)
- M. PRIMAKOVA, ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE OF SERVITUDE AS AN ACCOUNTING OBJECT AND ITS CLASSIFICATION, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 14 (2015)
- K. AFANASEVA, PROBLEMS OF TRANSFORMATION OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEM AND THE REPORTING IN BEEKEEPING, Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and legal sciences: No. 14 (2014)