ARGUMENTATIVE SUPERSTRUCTURE COMPONENT OF POPULAR SCIENCE SPEECHES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article focuses on the argumentative superstructure component of popular science speeches. It includes three subcomponents (thesis, argument, demonstration). The thesis illustrates the position of the author of a popular science speech regarding the issue raised in the speech. The argument is a means of proving the statement. The demonstration is a means of explaining / clarifying the first two subcomponents. Thus, the function of the demonstration is to help the audience / listeners understand the full scope of the information contained in the thesis and argument. The palette of linguistic means marks the argumentative supercomponent and its subcomponents described in this article. Understanding superstructure generation mechanisms is necessary for translation & interpreting students in particular to remember large amounts of information better when interpreting.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Лисанюк Е.Н. Логико-когнитивная теория аргументации: дис. … д-ра филос. наук: 09.00.07; Санкт-Петерб. гос. ун-т. – СПб., 2015. – 297 л.
Мягкова А.Ю. Речевые средства аргументации и изобличения во лжи в политическом дискурсе // Филология и культура. Philology and culture. – 2015. – № 3(41). – С. 94–98.
Карчаева С.Х. Дискурсивность научного текста: автореф. дис. …канд. филол. наук: 10.02.19; Кабардино-Балк. гос. ун-т им. Х. М. Бербекова. – Нальчик, 2010. – 21 с.
Take back your city with paint [Электронный ресурс]. – URL: https://www.ted.com/talks/edi_rama_take_back_your_city_with_paint. (Дата обращения: 01.08.2022).
Темботова Е.В. Цитирование как дискурсивная стратегия // Актуальные проблемы филологии и педагогической лингвистики: сб. науч. тр. – Владикавказ: Северо-Осет. гос. ун-т им. К. Л. Хетагурова, 2011. – Вып. 13. – С. 170–173.