SOLVING THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE OF INTEMPORALITY BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF CLOSEST CONNECTION IN THE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the paper on the basis of general scientific methods, legal modeling techniques, the author made an attempt to establish the interaction of the most significant factors of legal relations complicated by a foreign element in the time plane. An attempt is made to identify the most significant presumptions in relations with a foreign element in the spatio-temporal relationship model in the Anglo-Saxon and Roman-German legal cultures. Taking into account time-dependent factors in private international law implies a special model for analyzing the legal relationship, which allows finding the localizing factor in the space-time plane, taking into account the most significant factor in the group of elements of legal relations arising from cross-border relations. For this, the author uses the epistemological category of validity and relevance. Validity is relevance, relevance is the importance of specific elements (or groups) of conditions for analyzing the factual composition of the legal relationship when using flexible regulation to determine the applicable law in the absence of agreement between the parties to the dispute about the choice of law. The author proposed changes in the regulatory field of the Republic of Belarus, with an inherent increase in the methodological role of the principle of closest connection in resolving mobile conflict and implementing the binding conditions lex rei sitae. The conclusions made in this work can serve as a further platform for researchers of private international law in the field of conflict regulation of the Republic of Belarus.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Hay, P. The Situs rule in European and American conflicts law: comparative notes / P. Hay // Legal essays in honor of John E. Cribbet / еd.: P. Hay, M. H. Hoeflich ; Univ. of Illinois. – Bloomington, 1988. – P. 109.
О кодексе международного частного права. ст. 87. §1 [Электронный ресурс] : Закон Бельгии, 16 июля 2004 г. // Федеральная государственная служба Бельгии. – Режим доступа: http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgiloi/change_lg.pl?language=fr&la=F&table_na. – Дата доступа: 12.02.2020.
Rozas, J. C. F. Sobre el contenido del Derecho internacional privado / J. C. F. Rozas // Rev. Esp. de Derecho Intern. – 1986. – Vol. 38. – P. 69–108.
Ballesteros, M. H. New perspectives in Spanish legalpractice on the exercise of rights of access across international borders / M. H. Ballesteros // Yearbook of Private Intern. Law. – 2007. – Vol. 9. – P. 387–398.
Fan Xiaoliang. Comparative study on selected aspects of the latest private international law legislation across the Taiwan Straits / Fan Xiaoliang, Li Qingming // Frontiers of Law in China. – 2015. – Vol. 10. – P. 316–342.
Tu Guangjian. Private international law in China [Electronic resource] / Tu Guangjian // Springer Science, 2016. – Mode of access: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-981-287-993-6%2F1.pdf. – Date of access: 23.02.2019. .
Гражданский кодекс Кабо-Верде [Электронный ресурс] : Ордонанс 30 cент. 1997 г, № 68-A/97 // World Intellectual Property Organization. – Режим доступа: https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/202959. – Дата доступа: 13.12.2020.
Об утверждении Гражданского кодекса Алжира [Электронный ресурс] : постановление 26 сент. 1975 г., № 75-58 // Высшая школа экономики. – Режим доступа: https://pravo.hse.ru/data/2015/10/22/1079346453/Алжир%201975.pdf. – Дата доступа: 13.12.2020.
Гражданский кодекс Республики Беларусь [Электронный ресурс] : 7 дек. 1998 г., № 218-З : принят Палатой представителей 28 окт. 1998 г. : в ред. Закона Респ. Беларусь от 18.12.2019 г. // Национальный правовой Интернет-портал Республики Беларусь. – Режим доступа: http://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=hk9800218. – Дата доступа: 13.12.2020.
Mauri, G. The Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and its Protocol on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment: a Belgian Perspective / G. Mauri, B. van. Itterbeek // Uniform Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 9. – P. 549.
Pivavatnapanich, P. Choice of law in contract and thai private international law [Electronic resource] : a comparative study / P. Pivavatnapanich // Thailand law forum : law analysis and features on southeast Asia. – Mode of access: http://thailawforu. – Date of access : 23.02.2019.
Любарская, Т.С. Коллизионная привязка к местонахождению вещи для определения права, применимого к вещным правам: достоинства и недостатки / Т.С. Любарская // Закон. – 2016. – № 8. – С. 48.
Schwimann, M. Internationales Privatrecht : Einschliesslich Europarecht / M. Schwimann. – 3rd ed. – Wien : Manz, 2001. – 179 S.
Плеханов, В.В. Переход права собственности по договору международной купли-продажи товаров : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.03 / В.В. Плеханов. – М., 2008. – 185 л.
Mauri G., Itterbeek B. van. The Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and its Protocol on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment: a Belgian Perspective // Uniform Law Review. 2004. Vol. 9. P. 549.
Unternehmensberatung, A. § 1 IPRG (IPR-Gesetz), Grundsatz der stärksten Beziehung [Electronic resource] // Jusline : Recht. Schnell. – Mode of access: https://www.jusline.at/gesetz/iprg/paragraf/1. – Date of access: 18.08.2018.
Carruthers, J. M. The transfer of property in the conflict of laws: choice of law rules concerning inter vivos transfers of property / J. M. Carruthers. – Oxford : Univ. Press, 2005. – 347 p.
Venturini, G. C. Property / G. C. Venturini // International еncyclopedia of сomparative law : [in 43 vol.] / ed. K. Zweigert. – Leiden, 1976. – Vol. 3 : Mohr and Moution, сhap. 21. – P. 12.
Carter, P. B. Transnational trade in works of art: the position in english private international law / P. B. Carter ; Intern. Sales of Works of Art. – Geneva : Workshop, 1985. – [without spec. p.].
Закон Китайской Народной Республики о применении права к гражданско-правовым отношениям, выходящим за пределы одного государства [Электронный ресурс] : принят 28 окт. 2010 г. на 17 заседании Постоянного комитета 11 Национального Народного Конгресса . – Режим доступа: https://chinalaw.center/civil_law/china_international_private_law_2010_russian/. – Дата доступа: 18.08.2018.
Unternehmensberatung, A. Kommentar zum § 1 IPRG. Ulrike Christine Walter am 15.03.2012 [Electronic resource] // Jusline : Recht. Schnell. – Mode of access: https://www.jusline.at/gesetzeskommentare/456476624. – Date of access: 27.08.2018.
Толстых, В.Л. Применение права страны с множественностью правовых систем в международном частном праве / В.Л. Толстых // Междунар. публ. и частное право. – 2003. – № 2. – С. 34–36.
Jessel-Esse, Ch. The Bulgarian private international law Code оf 2005 / Ch. Jessel-Esse // Yb. of Priv. Intern. Law. – 2007. – Vol. 9. – P. 375–385.
Code de droit international privé [Electronic resource] : 27 du Nov. 1998 // Portail de la Justice en Tunisie. – URL : http://www.e-justice.tn. – Date of access : 23.02.2019.