PHENOMENOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SPEECH COMPETENCE OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Анатацыя
Based on a retrospective analysis of the academic discourse of several decades, the article shows that the term “speech competence” has not received a commonly accepted definition, especially when it comes to the preschool age. The study conducted by the authors has made it possible to determine the phenomenological characteristics of the preschoolers’ speech competence, considering it as a dynamic integral personal quality, manifested in the ability and willingness to successfully listen, perceive and reproduce information, be engaged in conversation, express personal opinions and points of view in the oral form in accordance with the age norm. Its lexical, phonological, grammatical, dialogical and monological functional components have been identified and defined subject to pedagogical impact. These components contain operational characteristics of the speech competence of preschoolers. The speech competence of preschool children includes also the following meta-components: awareness of the ways and means of speech interaction; adequacy of selection of available speech skills, their application in speech activity; orientation in a communication situation; complex, variable and creative application of speech and non-speech means in accordance with the set goal. Following the internal structure of the speech competence of preschool children in the educational process should make it more systematic and the results of this process easier to measure in their complex, integrative wholeness.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Гэты твор даступны па ліцэнзіі Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрыбуцыя») 4.0 Сусветная.
Бібліяграфічныя спасылкі
White R.W. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence // Psychological Review. – 1959. – № 66(5). – P. 297–333. DOI: 10.1037/h0040934
Rychen D.S., Salganik L.H. Defining and selecting key competencies. – Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber, 2001. – 324 pp.
Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. – Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965. – 240 pp.
Gronlund N.E., Linn R.L. Measurement and evaluation in teaching. – New York: Macmillan, 1990. – 530 pp.
Barnett, R. The limits of competence: knowledge, higher education and society. – Buckingham: SRHE; Open University Press, 1994. – 207 pp.
The design of a study environment for acquiring academic and professional competence / P. Kirschner, H. Hummel, P. van Vilsteren et al. // Studies in Higher Education. – 1997. – № 22(2). – P. 151–171. DOI: 10.1080/03075079712331381014
Mitchelmore S., Rowley J. Entrepreneurial competencies: a literature review and development agenda // International journal of entrepreneurial behaviour and research. – 2010. – № 16(2). – P. 92–111. DOI: 10.1108/13552551011026995
Moore D.R., Cheng M.I., Dainty A.R.J. Competence, competency and competencies: performance assessment in organizations // Work Study. – 2002. – № 51(6). – P. 314–319. DOI: 10.1108/00438020210441876
Boyatzis R.E. The competent manager: A model for effective performance. – New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1991. – 288 pp.
Jude N., Hartig J., Klieme E. Kompetenzen als ergebnisse von bildungsprozessen // Kompetenzerfassung in pädagogischen Handlungsfeldern: Theorien, Konzepte und Methoden. – Berlin: BMBF, 2008. – Р. 15–26.
Taylor D.S. The meaning and use of the term competence in linguistics and applied linguistics // Applied Linguistics. – 1988. – № 9. – P. 148–169. DOI: 10.1093/applin/9.2.148
Chomsky N. Rules and representations. – New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. – 318 pp.
Hymes D.H., Pride J.B., Holmes J. On communicative competence // Sociolinguistics. – Baltimore: Penguin Books Ltd., 1972. – P. 269–293.
Campbell R., Wales R. The study of language acquisition // New horizons in linguistics. – Harodsworth: Pinguin Books Ltd., 1970. – P. 242–260.
Teachman G., Gibson B.E. “Communicative competence” in the field of augmentative and alternative communication: a review and critique // International journal of language and communication disorder. – 2014. – № 49(1). – P. 1–14.
Canale M., Swain M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing // Applied Linguistics. – 1980. – № 1. – P. 1–47. DOI: 10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Bagarić V., Mihaljević-Djigunović J. Defining communicative competence // Metodika. – № 8(1). – 2007. – P. 94–103.
Pentyluk M., Conceptual foundations of communicative methodology of the Ukrainian language teaching / M. Pentyluk, O. Goroshkina, A. Nikitina // Actual problems of modern linguodidactics: collection of articles. – Kyiv: Lenvit, 2011. – P. 226–237.
Bogush A.M. Pedagogical speech correction of preschool children in play activities. – Nikolaev: Atoll, 2007. – 274 pp.
Speech competence of primary school students: cognitive approach / M. Hreb, N. Hrona, V. Chumak et al. // Journal of History Culture and Art Research. – 2020. – № 9(2). – P. 165–174. DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2437
Bloom L., Lahey M. Language development and language disorders. – New York: Macmillan, 1988. – 535 pp.
Zaitseva K.P. The concept of “speech competence” in preschool children // Modernization of the professional education system based on regulated evolution: proceedings of the 20th International scientific and practical conference, Chelyabinsk, 16 Nov, 2021 / Chelyabinsk institute for retraining and advanced training of educators. – Chelyabinsk, 2021. – P. 77–79.